In a survey released this morning by Scioto Analysis, 15 of 16 Ohio economists agreed that implementing evidence-based early childhood literacy curriculum in Ohio public schools would improve human capital in the long run. In recent months, Governor DeWine has reinforced his desire to require these practices, commonly referred to as the “science of reading,” in Ohio’s public schools.
As Kevin Egan (University of Toledo) wrote: “Children are our future workers, investing in high quality education for all children grows the future economy more and equalizes opportunity for everyone.”
Despite the consensus opinion from respondents, some economists identified challenges that this program could face.
“My answer is based on my understanding that research shows the current reading curriculum leads to disparities, hence the switch to ‘evidence-based’ (new evidence),” said Curt Reynolds of Kent State University. “If these new strategies help close gaps in education that would be very important.”
“There may be challenges faced in effective implementation of the programs and schools may need additional support to provide teacher training, " said Faria Huq of Lake Erie College.
Assuming these techniques are implemented well and teachers are prepared, Ohio economists are optimistic about some of the secondary effects this program might have. 15 of 16 respondents agreed that these practices could grow the economy in the long run, and 14 of 16 respondents agreed that these practices could reduce inequality in the long run.
The Ohio Economic Experts Panel is a panel of over 40 Ohio Economists from over 30 Ohio higher educational institutions conducted by Scioto Analysis. The goal of the Ohio Economic Experts Panel is to promote better policy outcomes by providing policymakers, policy influencers, and the public with the informed opinions of Ohio’s leading economists. Individual responses to all surveys can be found here.