Jonathan Andreas |
Bluffton University |
Disagree |
7 |
We can only deport people who are not here legally and they are ineligible for social services except kids can get public education and most of the kids of undocumented immigrants are US citizens by birth. Furthermore, undocumented workers typically pay payroll taxes even though they don't get any credit for it, so they subsidize Social Security and Medicare. |
David Brasington |
University of Cincinnati |
Agree |
8 |
|
Ron Cheung |
Oberlin College |
Strongly Disagree |
10 |
|
Kenneth Fah |
Ohio Dominican University |
Uncertain |
9 |
|
Will Georgic |
Ohio Wesleyan University |
Disagree |
4 |
The social safety net encompasses a variety of programs, but if we consider only the supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) as an example, we can see that undocumented immigrants make up only a small share of the total recipients. There were over 1.3 Million SNAP recipients in Ohio in July of 2024 and only an estimated 89,000 unauthorized immigrants. According to the Migration Policy Institute, fewer than half of these people would meet the income threshold to be eligible for SNAP and a likely even smaller share would choose to apply. Ultimately this means that the number of SNAP recipients in the state would shrink by no more than 4% with deportations of unauthorized immigrants. While reducing recipients by 4% would lower payments, tax revenue would also decrease by deporting tax payers and decreasing economic activity throughout the state. It's difficult to state with confidence which effect would dominate. |
Bob Gitter |
Ohio Wesleyan University |
Disagree |
8 |
In the grand scheme of things, given the few social programs that undocumented immigrants are eligible for (NOT Medicaid and Food Stamps), there would not be much impact. |
Nancy Haskell |
University of Dayton |
Uncertain |
5 |
|
Paul Holmes |
Ashland University |
Disagree |
7 |
People who might be deported from Ohio don't qualify for a lot of social services so the cost savings would be negligible; and the loss of tax revenue to support those services would decrease ability to pay for such services. |
Charles Kroncke |
Mount Saint Joseph University |
Strongly Disagree |
10 |
Mass deportations will drastically reduce the number of people paying into the social safety net. Many of those deported will be young workers and their families. |
Bill LaFayette |
Regionomics |
Disagree |
9 |
Assuming that only unauthorized noncitizens are deported, the impact on the safety net would be negligible. These individuals are not eligible for public benefits under PRWORA (with limited exceptions). |
Trevon Logan |
Ohio State University |
Strongly Disagree |
8 |
|
Michael Myler |
University of Mount Union |
Disagree |
6 |
|
Joe Nowakowski |
Muskingum University |
Strongly Disagree |
9 |
The cost to the economy would add to the stress |
Curtis Reynolds |
Kent State University |
Disagree |
5 |
Most research suggests that undocumented workers do not put a large strain on the social safety net. In fact, they appear to help others such as Social Security through their payroll taxes. |
Kay Strong |
Independent |
Strongly Disagree |
10 |
|
Iryna Topolyan |
University of Cincinnati |
Disagree |
10 |
|
Ejindu Ume |
Miami University |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Andy Welki |
John Carroll University |
Agree |
8 |
|
Kathryn Wilson |
Kent State University |
Disagree |
8 |
Estimates are that undocumented immigrants pay more than $250 million in taxes within the state of Ohio per year. There would be some reduction in education expenses within Ohio if there were mass deportation, but most social safety net programs are not available to undocumented immigrants. I expect that the loss in tax revenue would more than offset the reduction in costs within Ohio. |
Rachel Wilson |
Wittenberg University |
Disagree |
9 |
Evidence shows immigrants quickly become productive members of the economy and are a net benefit to the tax base. |