Jonathan Andreas |
Bluffton University |
Strongly Disagree |
9 |
The minimum wage increase would have a MUCH bigger effect for several reasons. First, it would be a $5.40/hr increase whereas nobody under the poverty line could get a $5.40/hr tax cut on tips alone (=over $10k/year for a full-time worker in tip tax)! Plus, the minimum wage increase affects all tipped workers at the bottom of the pay scale whereas the the tax cut would barely affect the poorest workers who pay zero income tax and the biggest benefits would go to the highest-income workers. It may cause lawyers to start asking for tips!! If the tip exemption also includes the payroll tax, then the poorest workers will merely be losing social security income which will increase poverty later in life because the return on social security taxes is relatively high for the poorest workers. The main danger of a high minimum wage is higher unemployment, but historically, the negative effects have been very small and particularly at times like now when unemployment is very low. |
David Brasington |
University of Cincinnati |
Disagree |
9 |
they already under-report so the gains are attenuated |
Kenneth Fah |
Ohio Dominican University |
Uncertain |
6 |
|
Will Georgic |
Ohio Wesleyan University |
Strongly Disagree |
7 |
The number of tipped workers in Ohio who are both in poverty and pay income taxes is vanishingly small. Exempting tips from income taxes will do very little to pull people out of poverty. Roughly doubling the tipped minimum wage to coincide with the overall statewide minimum wage will be much more effective at reducing poverty in a partial equilibrium sense. However, the ultimate effect will depend on how much of this increase in labor costs for employers is passed on to consumers and on the own-price elasticity of services provided by tipped workers. |
Bob Gitter |
Ohio Wesleyan University |
Strongly Disagree |
9 |
Neither one will have much effect. The minimum wage affects very few workers and it is higher income tipped-workers who will benefit from this change. |
Nancy Haskell |
University of Dayton |
Disagree |
6 |
Approximately 1/3 of tipped workers are in zero income tax bracket so removing taxes on tips does not help pull them out of poverty, while raising the tipped minimum wage would.
However, raising minimum wage for tipped workers might result in a substantial decrease in the generosity of tips, which could hurt tipped workers in their overall earnings. |
Michael Jones |
University of Cincinnati |
Agree |
5 |
|
Charles Kroncke |
Mount Saint Joseph University |
Strongly Disagree |
9 |
The sub minimum wage is significantly below the minimum wage. If the wage for tipped workers is raised to the minimum wage, employers will hire fewer tipped employees. This will make poverty worse. |
Bill LaFayette |
Regionomics |
Uncertain |
5 |
It depends. Tips are probably much more a factor for waitstaff in fine dining restaurants than those in diners and coffee shops. Some of the former could possibly be pulled out of strict poverty (but not necessarily up to a true living wage) but many of the latter would probably be better off with wages at the non-tipped minimum. |
Trevon Logan |
Ohio State University |
Disagree |
7 |
|
Joe Nowakowski |
Muskingum University |
Disagree |
5 |
|
Curtis Reynolds |
Kent State University |
Disagree |
8 |
I believe the bigger issue is that some people are not actually making enough in tips to meet the stated minimum wage for non-tipped workers. If so, that is a very real problem and likely varies across demographic groups. And, since taxes tend to be low for these workers, it is more important to increase income than decrease tax burden. |
Ejindu Ume |
Miami University |
Disagree |
8 |
|
Andy Welki |
John Carroll University |
Uncertain |
7 |
|
Kathryn Wilson |
Kent State University |
Strongly Disagree |
9 |
|